Your GenAI Code Debt is Coming Due. Here’s What Gartner® Predicts
Your innovation budget is about to get hijacked by GenAI coding risks.
That’s the warning I took away from the latest Gartner® predictions, which forecast that “by 2028, prompt-to-app approaches adopted by citizen developers will increase software defects by 2500%, triggering a software quality and reliability crisis.” These aren’t simple syntax errors that a quick code review can catch. They’re deep, contextual flaws—architecturally unsound, logically broken, and exponentially more expensive to fix than traditional bugs.
For security and engineering leaders, it seems the message is stark: the GenAI coding risks accumulating in your codebase today will consume the budgets you planned to spend on growth tomorrow.
Let’s take a closer look at their predictions as I share my thoughts.
GenAI Coding Risks Are Driving a Software Quality Crisis
For me, the most striking prediction from Gartner Research is that “by 2028, prompt-to-app approaches adopted by citizen developers will increase software defects by 2500%, triggering a software quality and reliability crisis.”
That’s not a typo. A twenty-five-fold increase in defects.
One finding Gartner shares is “a new class of defect is emerging as AI generates context-deficient code. While syntactically correct, AI output often lacks awareness of the broader system architecture and nuanced business rules, introducing subtle but severe flaws. This results in complex architectural and logical bugs that are more damaging and significantly harder to detect with traditional testing methods than common coding errors.”
The findings also address the downstream effects, stating “the cost of quality will increase significantly. Remediation of these deep, contextual bugs will be exponentially more expensive than fixing simple coding errors, consuming budgets previously allocated to innovation.”
However, I’d say by mid-2026 and just beyond, I believe the GenAI will get smarter and it won’t be as much about an increase in severe flaws and vulnerabilities. The big challenge will be the immense volume of AI-generated code and apps that will crush security teams’ workloads as they attempt to keep pace.
AI Tool Costs Are About to Blow Past Your Budget
The quality crisis isn’t the only financial threat. Gartner Research predicts that “by 2027, 40% of enterprises using consumption-priced AI coding tools will face unplanned costs exceeding twice their expected budgets, increasing demand for structured cost oversight and optimization strategies.”
I believe this traces back to a fundamental mismatch between how AI tools are priced and how organizations budget for their software development. Consumption-based models that work well for mature cloud infrastructure create chaos when applied to AI coding assistants with unpredictable usage patterns.
In my opinion, the report reveals the extent of the problem and also offers some great recommendations, including “build a FinOps-style governance layer for AI tools, including real-time consumption monitoring, per-user budgets, and automated anomaly detection for runaway usage.”
If your organization is still planning out 2026 budgets, I think you should consider all of the included recommendations to ensure you can govern your AI spend, or at least not be surprised by it come 2027.
The Root Cause Goes Deeper Than the Tools
Why are defect rates projected to spike so dramatically? For me it seems this finding points to a behavioral pattern that’s already widespread within development. At the behavioral level, GenAI coding risks compound when developers, especially less experienced ones or even vibe-coders, accept AI-generated code without architectural scrutiny.
I think the report explains this behavior well, stating “automation bias is a key driver. There is a growing tendency, especially among less experienced developers, to implicitly trust AI suggestions and accept AI-generated code based on surface-level results rather than rigorous engineering analysis, bypassing critical thinking and code validation.”
Understanding this root cause is essential for building governance frameworks that actually work—rather than policies that developers can work around.
Governance Must Catch What AI Tools Can’t See
In my opinion, the recommendations center on governance frameworks that enforce human oversight at specific checkpoints in the development process. The report distinguishes between different types of AI coding tools and prescribes different governance approaches for each.
The guidance is specific: which development activities should remain under human control, where AI can be trusted to operate independently, and how to structure review processes that don’t create bottlenecks. The findings also address how to reinforce software development fundamentals in an AI-augmented environment—including which practices should be non-negotiable quality gates.
For security leaders building or updating AI governance policies, I think this section of the report will provide you with a framework grounded in expert opinion, rather than vendor marketing.
There’s a 30% Cost Reduction Available—If You Get the Boundaries Right
Not all of these annual predictions are cautionary. The findings forecast that “by 2028,GenAI will reduce application modernization costs by 30% compared with 2025 levels, but will require robust governance to mitigate risk.” But capturing those savings requires organizational changes that most enterprises haven’t made yet.
I believe it specifies which responsibilities should remain with human experts, which can be delegated to AI agents, and how to structure teams around this division. It also identifies infrastructure prerequisites that organizations need in place before AI modernization tools can deliver value—explaining why some pilots succeed while others stall indefinitely.
If you’re planning your own modernization initiatives, this section of the predictions report provides a readiness checklist and team structure recommendations I think would benefit your organization.
How ArmorCode Can Help
AI-generated code is already flowing into production environments. The governance frameworks recommended in this predictions report require visibility into what’s being built, what vulnerabilities exist, and which risks demand immediate attention. ArmorCode’s unified platform provides that visibility, at scale.
Key capabilities that address GenAI coding risks:
MCP-Enabled Security Intelligence: Exposes security context directly to AI coding tools, making coding sessions security-aware by default.
AI-Powered Cross-Tool Correlation: Reduces alert volume by up to 90% by recognizing when multiple scanners report the same AI-generated vulnerability differently.
Developer Ownership Attribution: Maps every finding back to the commit author, establishing accountability even when AI writes the code.
Hidden Asset Discovery: Identifies containers, APIs, and services within AI-generated code before they reach production—stopping shadow IT at the source.
Anya Agentic AI: Replaces dashboard navigation with natural language queries so security insights move at the speed of AI development.
You can find out more here!
Conclusion
I feel these Gartner predictions make the stakes clear. Organizations that treat AI coding tools as productivity accelerators without building corresponding governance will face a crisis that consumes the budgets intended for innovation. The 2500% increase in defects isn’t inevitable—it’s the outcome for organizations that skip the architectural checkpoints, human reviews, and governance frameworks the prediction recommends.
Security leaders who act now can capture AI’s productivity benefits while building the visibility and controls needed to prevent AI-generated code from becoming their biggest liability. The organizations that get this balance right will ship faster and more securely. Those that don’t will spend the next several years cleaning up technical debt they didn’t know they were accumulating. And there will be a balancing act between the AI code tools and security scanning tools getting smarter, and combating the scale and volume problem.
If you want, you can download the full Gartner report to get the complete analysis and actionable strategies for governing AI-generated code before it becomes technical debt.
Gartner, Predicts 2026: AI Potential and Risks Emerge in Software Engineering Technologies, Annie Hodgkins, Brent Stewart, Howard Dodd, Joachim Herschmann, Philip Walsh, Arun Batchu. 3 December 2025.
Gartner is a trademark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates.
