Continuous Threat Exposure Management

Operationalize CTEM at enterprise scale

Connect every scanner, add business context, and drive governed exposure reduction through one independent control plane.

A CTEM program gives security teams the operating model for continuously reducing exposure at enterprise scale. ArmorCode provides the independent Agentic Control Plane to run that program across the tools you already own.

The adoption and volume of vibe coding

48 %

of surveyed organizations prioritize exposures using likelihood of active exploitation and impact to business-critical assets

52 %

still rely primarily on technical severity such as CVSS

45 %

use GenAI assistance or workflow automation in vulnerability workflows

18 %

use GenAI agents to prioritize exposures

CTEM spans multiple vendors. Your control plane should too.

CTEM now has to be time-based, decision-driven, and continuous across many tools and teams. Gartner’s guidance on exposure management maps closely to ArmorCode’s architecture: an independent control plane above the security stack you already own, not another scanner beside it.

ArmorCode is vendor neutral, connecting with 400+ tools and delivering scanner-agnostic prioritization with no rip and replace, plus the freedom to change tools without rebuilding the operating model.

The Context Risk Graph connects findings to assets, identities, ownership, business services, threat intelligence, reachability, and exploitability, so teams can choose to remediate, mitigate, validate, or accept.

Owners, SLAs, and workflows in Jira, ServiceNow, and DevOps tools carry each decision through to verified remediation, with human oversight and an audit trail.

The Five Stages of CTEM

From CTEM framework to working program

ArmorCode does not compete with the stages. It is the control plane across them, so each stage hands the next one its context intact.

Scoping: Align exposure to the business, not just the scanner.

Define what matters and who owns it with hierarchies, business services, applications, assets, AI inventory, and ownership.

Discovery: One exposure view across the tools you already own.

See the whole exposure surface. 400+ integrations normalize, deduplicate, and correlate findings across application, infrastructure, software supply chain, cloud, and AI.

Prioritization: Move from severity ranking to decision framing.

Focus on attacker-relevant risk using the Context Risk Graph, reachability, exploitability, criticality, ownership, business impact, and ArmorCode Advanced Threat Intelligence (AATI).

Validation: Validate the path, not just the score.

Prove which exposure paths are viable with reachability, threat intelligence, pentest findings, attack-path context, and connected specialist validation tools.

Mobilization: Turn context into governed action and prove the result.

Get the right action to the right owner fast with Anya Agents, no-code workflows, ticketing, SLAs, escalation, mitigation, remediation, and verification.

Discovery and adversarial validation can come from the specialist tools you already trust. ArmorCode connects and correlates their signals so your CTEM program keeps moving forward.

The ArmorCode Agentic Control Plane: your system of action

ArmorCode is the independent Agentic Control Plane built to operationalize CTEM across applications, infrastructure, software supply chain, cloud, and AI, without asking teams to replace the tools they trust.

400+ integrations, with normalization, deduplication, and correlation, so every tool’s findings enter on equal footing.

Learn more

To operationalize CTEM at scale, you need a graph, not another queue. One dynamic model of enterprise exposure connects technical risk to the business, the owner, and the realistic attacker path.

Learn more

Anya Agents correlate, triage, remediate, validate, route, and report, alongside custom and partner agents. Workflows are human-led, policy-governed, permissioned, and auditable. AI-scale discovery requires AI-scale action.

Learn more

Exposure reduction you can measure

400 +

integrations

75 %

average reduction in mean time to remediate (MTTR)

60 %

backlog reduction

3 x +

first-year ROI

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Learn more

Start here when infrastructure and vulnerability queues need risk-based decisions across teams.

Application Security Posture Management

Learn more

Start here when application security findings and developer-facing backlogs create the most pressure.

Software Supply Chain Security

Learn more

Start here when software supply chain exposure needs the same ownership and SLAs as everything else.

AI Exposure Management

Learn more

Start here when AI adoption is adding exposure you cannot yet inventory or govern.

Q: Is ArmorCode a CTEM solution?

A: ArmorCode is the control plane that operationalizes CTEM. CTEM is a continuous operating model, not a single product category. ArmorCode connects the tools, data, context, workflows, and governance needed to run that model.

Q: Does ArmorCode replace scanners?

A: No. Independence is part of the value. ArmorCode connects your existing scanners and security tools, normalizes their output, and creates a shared operating layer above them.

Q: Does ArmorCode replace adversarial validation tools?

A: No. ArmorCode can correlate reachability, threat intelligence, pentest findings, and validation evidence, and it can integrate specialist validation tools where active testing is required.

Q: What is the Context Risk Graph’s role in CTEM?

A: It turns disconnected signals into a dynamic model of exposure by connecting findings to assets, identities, ownership, business services, threat intelligence, reachability, exploitability, and criticality.

Q: Where do Anya Agents fit?

A: They act on the graph. Agents help correlate, triage, research, remediate, mitigate, patch, validate, route, and report while remaining permissioned, governed, auditable, and human-led.

Q: How is UEM different from CTEM?

A: CTEM describes the operating model. UEM describes the cross-domain architecture and platform breadth that makes that operating model practical across applications, infrastructure, supply chain, cloud, and AI.

Q: What are the five stages of CTEM?

A: CTEM runs through five stages: scoping, discovery, prioritization, validation, and mobilization. Scoping defines what matters and who owns it. Discovery maps the exposure surface across environments. Prioritization focuses on attacker-relevant risk. Validation confirms which exposure paths are viable. Mobilization gets the right action to the right owner. ArmorCode supports every stage through a common control plane.

Q: How is CTEM different from traditional vulnerability management?

A: Traditional vulnerability management works in periodic cycles and triages work based on technical severity, such as CVSS. CTEM is a continuous operating model that scopes, discovers, prioritizes, validates, and mobilizes against exposure, using context such as exploitability, reachability, and business impact. It also measures how long attacker-relevant exposure persists, beyond simply counting open vulnerabilities.

Q: What is the biggest challenge in the mobilization stage?

A: The biggest challenge is the disconnect between the security teams that identify risk and the IT and development teams that fix it, which delays remediation. Automated workflows that identify asset owners and give them clear, context-aware remediation guidance inside the tools they already use help close that gap. ArmorCode drives those workflows through Jira, ServiceNow, and DevOps tools, with Anya Agents helping route and remediate issues.

  • CTEM is an operating model, not a product category. Continuous threat exposure management is a continuous program for scoping, discovering, prioritizing, validating, and mobilizing against exposure, and ArmorCode operationalizes it.
  • Severity should not drive the queue. 52% of surveyed organizations still rely primarily on technical severity such as CVSS, while 48% prioritize by likelihood of active exploitation and impact to business-critical assets. Context decides what is reachable, exploited, or tied to a critical service.
  • Tools hold the evidence, but nothing connects it. An independent control plane unifies findings from 400+ existing tools and adds business context, so teams keep the scanners they trust.
  • Action stalls without clear ownership. Governed workflows route each decision to the right owner with SLAs through Jira, ServiceNow, and DevOps tools, with Anya Agents helping.
  • Exposure reduction has to be provable. Open vulnerability counts say little about how long attacker-relevant exposure persists, so CTEM tracks SLAs and verifies fixes.